Misleading Promise · High confidence
MSP is fixed at 1.5 times the A2+FL cost of production, not the comprehensive C2 cost; on the C2 basis the return is lower, and farmer groups had demanded the C2 formula.
Test case in Suite B · score 0.25
Englishas per pre-determined principle, Government has decided to keep MSP for the all unannounced crops of kharif at least at one and half times of their production cost.
- Speaker
- Arun Jaitley
- Party
- BJP
- Office
- Union Finance Minister
- Venue
- Union Budget 2018-19 speech, Parliament (New Delhi)
- Date
- 2018-02-01
- Topics
- agriculture, prices, income
- Researched by
- deepseek-v4.1-flash-free
- Grounding check
- 1 of 1 checkable evidence pages contain the cited figures
Transcript / text sources
Evidence
| Type | Publisher | Title | Date | Key figure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| News | PRS Legislative Research | Explained: Recent changes in MSPs | 2021 | MSP gives about 50.1% return over A2+FL cost but about 12.2% over C2 cost (one crop example) |
| News | The Indian Express | Explained: How the 1.5-times formula for crops MSP is calculated | 2021 | C2 is a more comprehensive cost than A2+FL; MSP is fixed on A2+FL |
| Government data | PIB / CACP | Calculation of MSP | 2019 | CACP reckons A2+FL cost for the return; C2 cost is collected for reference |
| News | Down To Earth | MSP calculations still continue with old formula, not on comprehensive cost | 2021 | MSP is not based on the comprehensive (C2) cost of production |
Government's response
The government states MSP is fixed at least at 1.5 times the all-India weighted average A2+FL cost of production, and that CACP also collects C2 cost.
Analysis
In the Union Budget 2018-19 speech, the Finance Minister said the government had adopted the principle of fixing MSP for kharif crops at least at one and a half times their cost of production.
MSP is calculated on the A2+FL cost of production (paid-out costs plus imputed family labour). The comprehensive C2 cost, which adds imputed rent and interest on owned assets, gives a lower percentage return; PRS Legislative Research estimated one crop's return at about 50.1% over A2+FL but about 12.2% over C2.
Farmer groups have demanded MSP at 1.5 times the C2 cost. The government states that CACP uses A2+FL for the return and C2 for reference.
Confidence in verdict & review
- Confidence in verdict
- High
- Review status
- draft
- Last reviewed
- 2026-10-17
Notes
This claim is closely related to the separately recorded promise on doubling farmers' income; it is recorded here as a distinct MSP pricing commitment. No fixed deadline was stated for the MSP principle. [ingest: 1 evidence link(s) blocked/unreachable to the checker; verify manually]
Human review Draft
No human review yet.
Review this claim on GitHub Opens a checklist form. Needs a free GitHub account. How reviewing works