Review claims

Every entry starts as a draft, many of them researched by an AI model. Nothing should be trusted until people have checked it. Anyone can review; reviews from the trusted reviewer list count toward verification.

How to review a claim

1. Open the claim page and read the quote, verdict, evidence and analysis.
2. Check the quote. Open the transcript or video source. Is the wording right, or correctly labelled "paraphrased"? Was it said by this person, on this date?
3. Check the evidence. Open at least two evidence links. Do they say what the "key figure" says? Prefer primary data (ministry data, Parliament answers, CAG, RBI, NSO).
4. Check the verdict against the definitions on the methodology page. Would a careful person from either side of politics agree with it?
5. Check the wording is neutral, and that any government or party response is included.
6. Press Review this claim on GitHub, tick the checklist, choose a decision and submit. A bot records your review on the claim within a few minutes and the site updates.

Rules: a claim is verified after two approvals from different trusted reviewers with the full checklist ticked. Any trusted "reject" or "request changes" marks it disputed until the entry is fixed. Your latest review replaces your earlier one on the same claim. Corrections to the data itself: open a pull request against data/claims/<id>.json. Trusted reviewers are listed in reviewers.json.

Review queue (170)

Order: disputed first, then entries closest to verification, then lowest confidence and weakest automated grounding.